Ace Attorney RPG

So how possibly could it have fallen out of your pocket? Mr Hammer, can we even be sure that this vomit story is true? The only way is to call Mr K to the stand. Your Honour would it be possible for K to testify?

Very well. Detective Routledge!

Routledge: Yes, your honour?

Find this 'K' and bring him to the witness stand immediately.

Routledge: Heh, no sweat.

Meanwhile we will now take a 10 minute recess. Both sides of the court, make sure to read through all the evidence so far and read it carefully. Hammer Bro.'s testimony has been added to the court record as evidence.

Hammer Bro.s testimony submitted into Court Record.

*10 minutes later*

Routledge: Your honour, we've got him. And, would you believe it, he's a decisive witness.

I see. Then it would be more important that he testify about the murder first. Bailiff! Bring him to the witness stand.

Bailiff: Yes, sir. I mean- Your Honour.

*A young man in a chicken suit and trainers takes the stand.*

Your Honour. My name is K and I work at Als Toy Barn as mascott.

Shall I proceed with my testimony?

Please, go right ahead. You know, back in the day I also-

Kevo: Ahem... The testimony.

Right, of course. Tell us about what happened on the day of the murder.

"Interesting" *strokes chin in thought*

Interesting indeed. Mr. Cormsie, you may begin your cross-examination.

Ok. K, why, were there chicken feet in the bin of the crime scene, and even more importantly, why were they along with a pair of gloves? *Grins to himself*

*This music plays*

Routledge: Yes! I knew those chicken feet were suspicious- Oh crap! (My upcoming Detective report by Mr. Kevo...)

That doesn't explain what I asked!

I think what he means is that he had to pit the gloves and the chicken feet in the bin because there was vomit on the ground. He probably had them drenched in vomit

Then how come, in the crime scene, they were found without vomit?

Have you any proof of this Mr Cormsie or like your defendant are you making up lies as you go along?

Well, when they were found as evidence, nothing about vomit was mentioned.

SO, I believe you're the one lying, Kevo.

As I said before it was only a theory, if the witness would actually answer maybe he could spread a bit of light on this subject

Yes, I agree. Wake up, k!!

*Judge slams gavel to call order*

Routledge: We analysed the chicken feet, and found no vomit. That said, there is still little evidence to prove that it has anything to do with the case...except that they belong to the witness, which the witness confirmed before he arrived at the courthouse.

Evidence: Chicken Feet updated.

Very well. Mr. K, please testify about the disposed chicken feet - and the 'gloves'. The chicken feet did have your fingerprints, but that is not surprising since they do belong to you.



-Why I disposed of the chicken feet-

I knew it! Now, to see what k has to say for himself.

Mr Cormsie I must remind you that the chicken feet may have nothing to do with the case at all

This may not be relevant but why have you showed up today, in your suit but not your chicken feet and instead trainers? A bit strange?

Also, can I ask the detective what kind of gloves were found along with the chicken feet in the bin?

Methological Breakdown plays

Routledge: *Ahem* ...They're, er, thick nitrile gloves. They leave no fingerprints.

Evidence: Gloves updated.